我的读书生活演讲稿
各位老师，大家下午好，今天我演讲的题目是：我的读书生活。
在我的记忆里印象比较深刻的是《平凡的世界》，这本书在我的高考过程中激励着我。当我遇到困难的时候，想到孙少平背着千斤重的石板，迈着沉重的步伐，背上伤痕累累，汗水腌湿了眼睛，仍然坚持不放弃的向前走，我就从中获得一种坚韧坚持的力量。
在我的读书生活里，接触表较多的是有关《周易》的书，我先是阅读《周易》的原文及其翻译，首先接触的是中国周易学会会长刘大钧的书，了解了《周易》原文的基本意思，然后又阅读了其他的译本，然而研究的书籍有上千种，读多了有些混乱的感觉。通过阅读我了解了《周易》这本书的基本结构，了解了阴阳二爻、八卦等等，记忆了一些卦序。其实《周易》讲算命的并不多，学术界研究更多的是书中的哲学思想，《周易》传递给人的是一种积极向上的正能量。比如物极必反的道理，当一个人跌倒低谷，不必灰心。因为没有比这更糟的情况了，接下来就是上升阶段。
另外我接触比较多的就是有关鲁迅的书，鲁迅的小说，鲁迅的散文诗集《野草》，还有研究鲁迅的书。以前我觉得鲁迅就是一个横眉冷对，很冷酷的一个人。后来我觉得鲁迅其实是一个和蔼可亲甚至很可爱的人。比如在萧红写的文章里，描述了鲁迅很平易近人。在鲁迅与许广平的书信里，鲁迅表现得很可爱，比如署名画一只小象，自称小白象。
总之，我觉得读书可以在书里找到自己想要的东西，读书可以满足人的好奇心。读书还可以学到很多方法，读书更可以给人精神的力量……
已投稿到：
以上网友发言只代表其个人观点，不代表新浪网的观点或立场。女儿的演讲稿（原创）
尊敬的老师、亲爱的同学们：
& & 大家好！我叫***，我的竞选目标是历史科代表。今天，第一次登台演讲，此时此刻我很激动也很紧张，但是，我相信自己能战胜这种紧张情绪，因为我信奉拿破仑的那句名言，“不想当元帅的士兵不是好士兵”。
担任科代表，不仅没有耀眼的光环，而且意味着要付出相当多的时间和精力，同时还需要高度的责任心和一定的能力。这对我来说，既是一种考验，也是一种锻炼。因为，尽管我比较热爱学习，但是我性格有点内向，因此我希望能在为班服务过程中完善自我、提高自我。其次，之所以竞选历史科代表，是因为我喜欢历史课，更热爱祖国源远流长的历史，热爱祖国光辉灿烂的文化。
当然，假如我能竞选成功，并担任了历史科代表，我会做到1、认真背诵历史课文，2、认真收发作业，绝不乱扔大家的作业本，3、我会以身作则，要求大家做好的，我会做的更好。也许，我未能如愿以偿，但是我一定不会气馁，因为著名诗人汪国真说得好，“既然选择了前方，便只能风雨兼程”。
最后，请允许我套用诗人艾青的话做结语，“为什么我的眼中常含着泪，因为我对这土地爱得太深沉”。同样，我也希望同学们对咱们七（9）班爱得更深沉。
& 谢谢大家！
已投稿到：
以上网友发言只代表其个人观点，不代表新浪网的观点或立场。这是很久以前《战网魔》视频，杨永信的电击事件已过去很久，陶宏开又把发表言论：“女玩家不配当妈！”砖家叫兽自己看着办吧
分享这个视频的人喜欢
热门视频推荐
热门日志推荐
同类视频推荐
北京千橡网景科技发展有限公司：
文网文[号··京公网安备号·甲测资字
文化部监督电子邮箱：wlwh@··
文明办网文明上网举报电话： 举报邮箱：&&&&&&&&&&&&
请输入手机号，完成注册
请输入验证码
密码必须由6-20个字符组成
下载人人客户端
品评校花校草，体验校园广场hilary&benn演讲稿全文
Thank you very much Mr Speaker. Before I respond to the
would like to say this directly to the Prime Minister:Although my
right honourable friend the Leader of the Opposition and I willwalk
into different division lobbies
tonight,&I
am proud to speak from the same Despatch Box as him. My
righthonourable friend is not a terrorist
sympathiser,&he
is an honest,&a
principled,&a
decent and a good man and I think the Prime Minister must nowregret
what he said yesterday and his failure to do what he should have
donetoday,&which
is simply to say&‘I
am sorry’.
Now Mr Speaker,&we
have had an intense and impassioned debate and rightly
the clear and present threat from
Daesh,&the
gravity of the decision that rests upon the shoulders andthe
conscience of every single one of us and the lives we hold in our
handstonight. And whatever we decision we
hope we will treat one another with respect.
Now we have heard a number of outstanding speeches and sadlytime
will prevent me from acknowledging them all. But I would just like
tosingle out the contributions both for and against the motion from
my honourableand right honourable friends the members for Derby
South,&Kingston
upon Hull West and Hessle,&Normanton,&Pontefract
and Castleford,&Barnsley
Central,&Wakefield,&Wolverhampton
South East,&Brent
North,&Liverpool,&West
Derby,&Wirral
West,Stoke-on-Trent
North,&Birmingham
Ladywood and the honourable members for
Reigate,&South
West Wiltshire,&Tonbridge
and Malling,&Chichester
and Wells.
The question which confronts us in a
very,&very
complex conflict is at its heart very simple. What shouldwe do with
others to confront this threat to our
citizens,&our
nation,&other
nations and the people who suffer under the
cruel yoke,&of
Daesh?&The
carnage in Paris brought home to us the clear and presentdanger we
face from them. It could have just as easily been
London,&or
Glasgow,&or
Leeds or Birmingham and it could still be. And I believe thatwe
have a moral and a practical duty to extend the action we are
already takingin Iraq to Syria. And I am also
I say this to my colleagues,&that
the conditions set out in the emergency resolution passedat the
Labour party conference in September have been
We now have a clear and unambiguous UN Security CouncilResolution
2249,&paragraph
5 of which specifically calls on member states to takeall necessary
measures to redouble and co-ordinate their efforts to prevent
andsuppress terrorist acts committed specifically by
to eradicate the safe haven they have established oversignificant
parts of Iraq and Syria.
So the United Nations is asking us to do something. It is askingus
to do something now. It is asking us to act in Syria as well as in
Iraq. Andit was a Labour government &that helpedto
found the United Nations at the end of the Second World War. And
why did wedo so?&Because
we wanted the nations of the world,&working
together,&to
deal with threats to international peace and security & andDaesh is
unquestionably that.
So given that the United Nations has passed this
resolution,&given
that such action would be lawful under Article 51 of theUN Charter
& because every state has the right to defend itself & why would
wenot uphold the settled will of the United
Nations,&particularly
when there is such support from within the regionincluding from
Iraq. We are part of a coalition of over 60
countries,&standing
together shoulder-to-shoulder to oppose their ideologyand their
brutality.
Now Mr Speaker,&all
of us understand the importance of bringing an end to theSyrian
civil war and there is now some progress on a peace plan because of
theVienna talks. They are the best hope we have of achieving a
cease-fire. Thatwould bring an end to
bombing,&leading
to a transitional government and elections. And why isthat
Bothbecause it will help in the defeat of
Daesh,&and
because it would enable millions of
Syrians,&who
have been forced to flee,&to
do what every refugee dreams of: they just want to be able togo
Now Mr Speaker,&no-one
in this debate doubts the deadly serious threat we facefrom Daesh
and what they do,&although
sometimes we find it hard to live with the reality. Weknow that in
June four gay men were thrown off the fifth storey of a buildingin
the Syrian city of Deir ez-Zor. We know that in August the
82-year-oldguardian of the antiquities of
Palmyra,&Professor
Khaled al-Assad,&was
beheaded,&and
his headless body was hung from a traffic light. And we knowthat in
recent weeks there has been the discovery of mass graves in
Sinjar,&one
said to contain the bodies of older Yazidi women murdered byDaesh
because they were judged too old to be sold for
We know they have killed 30 British tourists in
Tunisia,&<span STYLE="font-size:10.5font-family:&微软雅黑&,&sans-serif&;color:#4
Russian holidaymakers on a plane,&<span STYLE="font-size:10.5font-family:&微软雅黑&,&sans-serif&;color:#8
people in suicide bombings in
Beirut,&Ankara
and Suruc. 130 people in Paris including those youngpeople in the
Bataclan whom Daesh & in trying to justify their bloody slaughter&
called&‘apostates
engaged inprostitution and vice’.
If it had happened here,&they
could have been our children. And we know that they areplotting
more attacks.
So the question for each of us & and for our national security &is
this: given that we know what they are
we really stand aside and refuse to act fully in our
self-defenceagainst those who are planning these
attacks?Can
we really leave to others the responsibility for defendingour
national security when it is our
responsibility?And
if we do not act,&what
message would that send about our solidarity with those
countriesthat have suffered so much & including Iraq and our
ally,&France.
Now,&France
wants us to stand with them and President Hollande & theleader of
our sister socialist party & has asked for our assistance and
help.And as we are undertaking airstrikes in Iraq where
hold has been reducedand we are already doing everything but engage
in airstrikes in Syria & shouldwe not play our full
It has been argued in the debate that airstrikes achievenothing.
Not so. Look at how Daesh’s
forward march has been halted in Iraq. The House will
rememberthat,&<span STYLE="font-size:10.5font-family:&微软雅黑&,&sans-serif&;color:#
months ago,&people
were saying:&‘they
are almost at thegates of Baghdad’.
And that is why we voted to respond to the Iraqi
government’s
request for help todefeat them. Look at how their military capacity
and their freedom of movementhas been put under pressure. Ask the
Kurds about Sinjar and Kobani. Now
ofcourse,&air
strikes alone will not defeat Daesh & but they make adifference.
Because they are giving them a hard time & and it is making it
moredifficult for them to expand their territory.
share the concerns that have been expressed this evening
aboutpotential civilian casualties.
However,&unlike
Daesh,&none
of us today act with the intent to harm civilians.
Rather,&we
act to protect civilians from Daesh & who target
innocentpeople.
Now on the subject of ground troops to defeat
Daesh,&there’s
been much debate about the figure of
70,<span STYLE="font-size:10.5font-family:&微软雅黑&,&sans-serif&;color:#0
and the governmentmust,&I
think,&better
explain that. But we know that most of them are currentlyengaged in
fighting President Assad. But I’ll
tell you what else we know,&is
whatever the number & 70,<span STYLE="font-size:10.5font-family:&微软雅黑&,&sans-serif&;color:#0,&<span STYLE="font-size:10.5font-family:&微软雅黑&,&sans-serif&;color:#,<span STYLE="font-size:10.5font-family:&微软雅黑&,&sans-serif&;color:#0,&<span STYLE="font-size:10.5font-family:&微软雅黑&,&sans-serif&;color:#,<span STYLE="font-size:10.5font-family:&微软雅黑&,&sans-serif&;color:#0
& the current size of the opposition forces mean the longerwe leave
taking action,&the
longer Daesh will have to decrease that number. And so
tosuggest,&Mr
Speaker,&that
airstrikes should not take place until the Syrian civil warhas come
to an end is,&I
miss the urgency of the terrorist threat that Daesh poses tous and
others,&and
I think misunderstands the nature and objectives of theextension to
airstrikes that is being proposed. And of course we should
takeaction. It is not a contradiction between the two to cut off
support in the form ofmoney and fighters and
weapons,&and
of course we should give humanitarian
of course we should offer shelter to more refugees includingin this
country and yes we should commit to play our full part in helping
torebuild Syria when the war is over.
Now I accept that there are legitimate
arguments,&and
we have heard them in the debate,&for
not taking this form of action now. And it is also clearthat many
members have wrestled,&and
who knows,&in
the time that is left,&may
still be wrestling,&with
what the right thing to do is. But I say the threat is
there are rarely,&if
ever,&perfect
circumstances in which to deploy military forces. Now weheard very
powerful testimony from the honorable member for Eddisbury
earlierwhen she quoted that passage,&and
I just want to read what Karwan Jamal
Tahir,&the
Kurdistan regional government high representative in
London,&said
last week and I quote:&‘Last
June,&Daesh
captured one third of Iraq over night and a few monthslater
attacked the Kurdistan region. Swift airstrikes by
Britain,&America
and France,&and
the actions of our own Peshmerga,&saved
us. We now have a border of 650 miles with Daesh.
pushed them back,&and
recently captured Sinjar. Again,&Western
airstrikes were vital. But the old border between Iraqand Syria
does not exist. Daesh fighters come and go across this
fictionalboundary.’&And
that is the argument Mr Speaker,&for
treating the two countries as one,&if
we are serious about defeating Daesh.
Now Mr Speaker,&I
hope the house will bear with me if I direct my closingremarks to
my Labour friends and colleagues on this side of the House. As
aparty we have always been defined by our internationalism. We
believe we have aresponsibility one to another. We never have & and
we never should & walk by onthe other side of the
And we are here faced by fascists. Not just their
calculatedbrutality,&but
their belief that they are superior to every single one ofus in
this chamber tonight,&and
all of the people that we represent. They hold us incontempt. They
hold our values in contempt. They hold our belief in toleranceand
decency in contempt. They hold our
democracy,the
means by which we will make our decision
tonight,&in
contempt. And what we know about fascists is that they needto be
defeated. And it is why,&as
we have heard tonight,&socialists
and trade unionists and others joined theInternational Brigade in
the 1930s to fight against Franco.
why this entire Housestood up against Hitler and Mussolini. It is
why our party has always stood upagainst the denial of human rights
and for justice. And my view,&Mr
Speaker,&is
that we must now confront this evil. It is now time for us todo our
bit in Syria. And that is why I ask my colleagues to vote for the
motiontonight.
已投稿到：
以上网友发言只代表其个人观点，不代表新浪网的观点或立场。