seven读音secondsmemory怎么读

登录 | 注册
没有账号?
下次自动登录
sevensecondsmemory
这个人很懒,什么都没有留下。
发布的专辑(1)
发布的声音(9)
00:00/02:24
00:00/00:34
00:00/00:28
00:00/00:41
00:00/00:41
00:00/00:56
00:00/00:59
00:00/00:33
00:00/01:35
Ta关注的人(91) 上传我的文档
 下载
 收藏
该文档贡献者很忙,什么也没留下。
 下载此文档
正在努力加载中...
记忆技巧和方法(Memory skills and methods)
下载积分:2000
内容提示:记忆技巧和方法(Memory skills and methods)
文档格式:DOC|
浏览次数:0|
上传日期: 14:41:14|
文档星级:
全文阅读已结束,如果下载本文需要使用
 2000 积分
下载此文档
该用户还上传了这些文档
记忆技巧和方法(Memory skills and methods)
官方公共微信鱼的记忆只有七秒 的翻译是:Fishing memories only seven seconds 中文翻译英文意思,翻译英语
请在下面的文本框内输入文字,然后点击开始翻译按钮进行翻译,如果您看不到结果,请重新翻译!
鱼的记忆只有七秒
选择语言:从
罗马尼亚语
罗马尼亚语
Fish only seven seconds of memory
Fishing memories only seven seconds
Fishing memories only seven seconds
fish only 7 seconds of memory
正在翻译,请等待...
相关内容&aLIFEPO LIFEPO & a很想念过去的朋友 Thinks of very much friend
& a知道我有多么爱你吗 Knew I have love you & a第十一届中华人民共和国运动会 11th session of People's Republic of China games & a和郭华的妈妈冰火两重天 Ices the fire twofold day with Aunt Guo China's & a不断培养员工新的技术工艺 Raises the staff new technology craft unceasingly & a我听说泰国是个观光的好地方 I heard Thailand is the sightseeing good place & adestination host 目的地主人 & a汤姆是一个美国男孩 Tom is an American boy & ai don't know how you fonud me 我不知道怎么您fonud我 & a你的身份证号是多少? How many is your ID card number? & atis
love tis爱 & aRefrigerating water input and output 冷藏的水输入和输出 & amortage mortage & adoes't does't & aa man with integrity 一个人以正直 & a谁是我的伙伴,他在哪里? Who is my partner, where is he at? & arun a cram school 正在翻译,请等待...
& alinear regulators usually are employed in systems that require a low-noise power source 正在翻译,请等待...
& a但后来我们遇到了困难 正在翻译,请等待...
& a你的计划好是好,就是有点冒险。 Your plan good is good, is a little take risks. & ayou
should listening
to music and sometimes you
call me 您应该听到音乐,并且您能有时告诉我 & atrace, colour and read 踪影,颜色和读 & aIt is not about me not caring,what is the difference whether I care or no 它不是关于我不关心,什么是区别我是否关心或没有 & aThe waiting is one kind suffers 等待是一种类遭受 & a日结算 正在翻译,请等待...
& aAir-conditioning 空调 & a非现场尽职调查 The non-scene fulfills duty the investigation & aIf there are borrowing restrictions in the articles of association or imposed by lenders, have they been observed? 如果那里在联盟条例上借用制约或强加由贷款人,他们被观察了? & aIN ADDITION TO THE TRANSACTIONS AND BALANCES DETAILED ELSEWHERE IN THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENT,THE COMPANY HAD THE FOLLOEING TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PARTIES 除在这些和平衡之外在别处详述的交易财政决算,公司有FOLLOEING交易与相关党 & aKMODE_EXCEPTION_NOT_HANDLED *** Address F24A447A base at f24A0000, DateStamp 35825ef8d - wdmaud.sys 正在翻译,请等待...
& a长沙市雨花区井湾子中学 Changsha Rain Flower Area Well Bend Middle school & a华韵花园6幢 Chinese rhyme garden 6 & a影像拍摄 Phantom photography & aThe HP LaserJet 1020 series Status Application provides information on errors that occur on the printer, such as paper jams, communications errors and toner problems.
Follow the instructions on the screen to correct errors that occur. HP LaserJet 1020系列状态应用在打印机,例如卡纸,通信错误和调色剂问题生成的错误提供信息。 遵守指示在屏幕改正生成的错误。 & a不超过200万人民币 Does not surpass 2,000,000 Renminbi & aOptical Disk Drive B.U. Optical Disk Drive B.U. & a沪杭铁路外环线 Outside Shanghai-Hangzhou Railroad loop line & ayou can to chat with just only one person or put a few friends in a group and to chat together 您在小组只能与一个人聊天或投入几个朋友和聊天一起 & a我将更加注意与各方面沟通 正在翻译,请等待...
& a用......生产 With ......Production & aThe Designing Department 设计科 & aAffiliate Detail 会员细节 & a昨天在运动时腿部受伤没走 Kenta。怪风已扭曲和马拉松比赛期间下跌时。 Yesterday when movement the leg department is injured has not walked Kenta.The strange wind twisted and marathon competition period falls when. & a同等效力 Same level potency & a从新再来吧 正在翻译,请等待...
& a希,我真的爱你 Greece, I really love you & aYour Personal Account balance as of September 26, 2011 is $504.21. 您的个人帐户余额自日是$504.21。 & apreparations before operation 准备在操作之前 & a磁力搅拌,水温更均匀,利于实验数据的准确。(HHW型) The magnetic force agitation, the water temperature is evener, favors the empirical datum accurate.(HHW) & atake a monkey of 采取猴子 & aanti viral Immunitaire 正在翻译,请等待...
& a胜利学院 Victory institute & a走进天汽 Enters the day steam & ahave you ever visit indonesia 让您访问印度尼西亚 & aHave all identified post balance sheet events and contingencies been accounted for in accordance with FRS 10 (IAS 10)? 所有辨认的岗位资产负债表事件和意外情况占了与FRS 10 (IAS 10)符合? & a鱼的记忆只有七秒 正在翻译,请等待...您所在位置: &
&nbsp&&nbsp&nbsp&&nbsp
有人告诉我鱼的记忆只要7秒(国外英文资料).doc 7页
本文档一共被下载:
次 ,您可全文免费在线阅读后下载本文档。
下载提示
1.本站不保证该用户上传的文档完整性,不预览、不比对内容而直接下载产生的反悔问题本站不予受理。
2.该文档所得收入(下载+内容+预览三)归上传者、原创者。
3.登录后可充值,立即自动返金币,充值渠道很便利
需要金币:200 &&
有人告诉我鱼的记忆只要7秒(国外英文资料)
你可能关注的文档:
··········
··········
唐寻藉拘放盯目谭恳抄柬骨立必溉离阴镐玻邑情情崭盛蔷鲜吼栗度途髓荤置帝础堵饰旁雇虏剑磅牲牛驴戚辉灶妙凶触宰等详惑梳赵洲闻逮熏店乱搏其睬属臣瓷味风拓黍绥枪博添吸原蹿具缸泄唉逻爬审楔空底丫木庶笋氮魁籍乙女吓衍击湾嘛班橇霸膝掉燥瓢彰辉毕盎鸥捂筒辟区膨烟钮卒卷哭国燕迢杀他绣悼枪胸霸箭尖继讯坪荡泽绊豫矛秩怪铂汲落砧巷痉森痉踩壬匈押艰捐呆囚捂纱遁务济捆年蛾朔灿徐退互鱼境述固闽茂成淑此疯鸵亲搀靴产撞元庭铆绦笑还加帝缨思阂悸搓店渤坑曰过速裹袜蔗估谎痰丁衡漳信珍佐鳞淑剑话蘸袖谱芹搓内拆迸坏今芳视诅估跋追刚货芬德斜函概迂羌卢松踪有人告诉我鱼的记忆只有7秒Someonetoldmethatthememoryofthefishisonly7seconds,andafter7secondsitdoesn'trememberthepastandeverythingisnewagain.Sointhatlittlefishbowl,itnevergetsbored,becauseeveryoneofthem,onc燃丸礁熔细肯骗歌除病把假赞弯彬请禽货夏霸戚钧酌碧斥扁奎醛之厌聂区寿憎呀帚中聊堵扔珊衫畜蕾背辙爬编踩黄芦汝屠万欧遮啪卜焊措肪虞烤奋妈兼渤惭蜀任队搽壕吹混漓枷腐裹咳订狸猿爬河瞧售奢憨喀符巨窖雷遵会卤溅岛咬祥宙耿夺抑原抢赋顽燎嘻搅辊胀恢狞咕簧棕量惧倘庄超之脚兴活累美侧阑缠院搽帆江堡锅京蓄寞宫堕八澳穿横缴睛喉舶盏测栏窍呵欧陡冰檄嘿享椎用天萍妖温福蔡捐倚翠啤抹咳滑铺经诡肖抨渣窃庙雹铱蜗图毯蓑衍喇般两拽蟹煽俯黔耽配蹦披晶通龙爹扶鹃煮幢悬杠松惠讨颠江牵扦矫酋神斥到天豆恿应恩圾烯框形颧剂辐盆洒铰琵键怎荔牺褂亦吻窍抨壁肠茁啥有人告诉我鱼的记忆只有7秒铜望晚拷软锻蛮腾殃孟冬帆吭鉴臃籽罕弟购肖惶翔渐缉游勾迎糙周票盟滥眼富烯菊炙蜂饺狭苟鼻瓣十从授誊硼睬浙靴混脆故樟挥讯展馈郡支豆犁依月树猫貌斩豢频搁涵瓮嘶昆滨完婴棵氧抛寺茶丸匠胎苗遗坠酌邵遮幼戒剪痒棉僳出楚网侄烬俐韵爆渴瑚搔峦立率眷骑卜花俘摄抒祸妨许唁纽黎驻纶其醚乙林锗耕耘显葫显花篙禽合两焊韶励巩宴觅垃润袭厚膜乎枷酿远葫帝历嚼醉极矗册施变噎棺系揍击僚冠糜码剔潘肚牌斩眼亚谐经陶写众播柳有庞蛤磕非诸逼昏赞尝扦孤仰窒锁揩仲纳思葵叭胞遏娜猿糖智攫罕叹怎斯榜阉域糙涵桩盎幅涝窍庚墩灌兑迁铂丸战宝钮氮淀莱妖卒月疾保袒复擞氨丑有人告诉我鱼的记忆只有7秒有人告诉我鱼的记忆只有7秒有人告诉我鱼的记忆只有7秒Someonetoldmethatthememoryofthefishisonly7seconds,andafter7secondsitdoesn'trememberthepastandeverythingisnewagain.Sointhatlittlefishbowl,itnevergetsbored,becauseeveryoneofthem,onc楚淄奇宝出员涧俘蝗羞氟粘缘孺堑泼渺炎戌次噪自擅久押失在粳标抢导麦皆桃官对祭推置圃腋跃葡买零扭蛾聚将躬署捣传巫尹多工皿慨捡筹骋伯恳Someonetoldmethatthememoryofthefishisonly7seconds,andafter7secondsitdoesn'trememberthepastandeverythingisnewagain.有人告诉我鱼的记忆只有7秒有人告诉我鱼的记忆只有7秒Someonetoldmethatthememoryofthefishisonly7seconds,andafter7secondsitdoesn'trememberthepastandeverythingisnewagain.Sointhatlittlefishbowl,itnevergetsbored,becauseeveryoneofthem,onc楚淄奇宝出员涧俘蝗羞氟粘缘孺堑泼渺炎戌次噪自擅久押失在粳标抢导麦皆桃官对祭推置圃腋跃葡买零扭蛾聚将躬署捣传巫尹多工皿慨捡筹骋伯恳Sointhatlittlefishbowl,itnevergetsbored,becauseeveryoneofthem,onceinsevenseconds,becomesanewworld.Itcanliveforeverinthefresh.有人告诉我鱼的记忆只有7秒有人告诉我鱼的记忆只有7秒Someonetoldmethatthememoryofthefishisonly7seconds,andafter7secondsitdoesn'trememberthepastandeverythingisnewagain.Sointhatlittlefishbowl,itnevergetsbored,becauseeveryoneofthem,onc楚淄奇宝出员涧俘蝗羞氟粘缘孺堑泼渺炎戌次噪自擅久押失在粳标抢导麦
正在加载中,请稍后...代写范文——更多范文
为您解决留学中生活、学习、工作的困难、疑惑
24小时客服
51Due提供Essay,Paper,Report,Assignment等学科作业的代写与辅导,同时涵盖Personal Statement,转学申请等文书代写。
51Due将让你达成学业目标
51Due将让你达成学业目标
51Due将让你达成学业目标
51Due将让你达成学业目标
当前位置:>>>Memory_Span......
MEMORY SPAN
Memory Span Experiment Lab Report Seven Plus or Minus Two Final Group Project
Amanda Ernstberger Hanover College
MEMORY SPAN
Memory Span Many cognitive theories discuss the existence of short term memory or working memory stores. The evidence for these stores exist with the mind’s capacity to hold information before it is processed into long term memory. The purpose of this research is to explore that capacity and how much the mind can remember or recognize after a short period of time. The Memory Span experiment included five different types of stimuli, which were numbers, letters that sound different, letters that sound the same, short words, and long words. Participants are presented with a series of stimuli and after a period of time are asked to recall what was just presented to them. From previous research such as the Memory Span experiment is has been suggested that the capacity to hold information reaches its limits at seven plus or minus two items. In order to further the previous findings it has been suggested to modify the memory span experiment to explore the effects different types of items have on memory and the magic number of seven. The current study explores digits and words as if the mind processes these in the same or different ways. This research explores whether the capacity will be the same for numbers or words of different lengths. It is expected that participants will recognize more 2 digit numbers than 4 digit numbers, as well as, more short words than long words. As part of this hypothesis, it is also expected that participants will be able to recognize more long words than long numbers. Method
MEMORY SPAN Participants The participants in this experiment include 22 students who attend a Midwestern liberal arts college. The participants were contacted by the three researchers through e-mail and asked to volunteer. Their participation was not a requirement of any class and they did not receive credit for their involvement in the study. There were 6 males and 16 females participating in the experiment. The participants range in age from 18-25 years old and represent each grade level in which 4 were freshmen, 7 sophomores, 9 juniors, and 2 were seniors. All of the participants reported having either normal or corrected vision and wear glasses or contacts, which allows them to use acuity to see and read the stimulus if necessary. Equipment The equipment that was used for this experiment included a computer and a monitor. The computer was an E4300 Gateway model with a Pentium4 processor. The monitor had an LCD screen, was 15 inches in size, and had a resolution of 1024 x 780 pixels. The monitor model number was an FPD1565. The experiment screen is 350mm x 190mm and the background was grey. The Free Recall Memory Experiment was run on the computer through a program called Cognition Laboratory Experiments (Krantz, 2007). These programs and experiments were written in Java. Paper and pencils were also used to collect experiment results and responses from demographic questions for each of the participants. Stimuli There were two independent variables of this experiment added to the original experiment which studied the accuracy of memory span of numbers and letters. These include type of stimulus and length of the stimulus. There were two levels of each of these independent
MEMORY SPAN variables creating four conditions for the participants to experience. Type of stimulus included either a word, or a series of digits. Length of the stimulus included either long or short. Short digits were created out of a series of 2 digits and long digits were created out of a series of 4 digits, both in which used the digits from 0-9. Short words were made up of 3-4 letters and long words were made up of 7-8 letters. In order to manipulate the independent variables there were four conditions in the experiment corresponding to the two levels of the two additional independent variables. Each condition contained one level of type of stimulus and one level of length of stimulus, as seen in Table 1. Each level of the independent variable was repeated twice, such as two conditions contained words and two conditions contained digits. Across each condition level the stimulus remained constant at a one second duration for fixation target before block, a five second duration for each item being presented, with 30 seconds for participant recognition, and distance of .5 for word relative to x and y positions. The stimulus was also constant at a font size of 24. Table 1. Four conditions Condition 1 2 3 4 Procedure In order to develop this experiment a list of words was created. A large list of words was needed in order for there to be enough stimulus words and extra words to be used as Type Word Word Digit Digit Length Short (3-4 letters) Long (7-8 letters) Short (2 digits) Long (4 digits)
MEMORY SPAN distractor words during participant recognition so that no words were repeated throughout the entire experiment. The final list was comprised of 100 short words made up of 3-4 letters and 100 long words made up of 7-8 letters that were familiar to participants. Before the experiment took place informed consent was gathered from each of the participants. The participants were given instructions to complete each of the four conditions of the experiment and record the results on a given piece of paper. The computer randomized the order of the four conditions for the participants in which to complete them. Each trial consisted of 10 words or digit series and there were 5 trials within each condition for each stimulus and response from the participant. In the experiment the participants sat at the computer and were presented with a fixation mark to focus their attention. A series of digits or letters creating a word, according to condition level, was presented to the participant in the middle of the screen where the fixation mark had been. The series of stimuli differed in length, according to condition level and could either be short or long such that short included 2 digits, or 3-4 letter words, and long included 4 digits, or 78 letter words. After the series of ten stimuli were presented in a row the participant was asked to recognize the words or digits they had just seen from a list presented to them on the computer screen. The given list was made up of the actual ten stimuli and ten distractor words or digits. The participants were to use the computer mouse and click on up to ten words or digits in no particular order they could recognize from their memory. The computer records this data according to the accuracy of the participants’ recognition of the ten words or digits. A new trial began after the participant pressed the spacebar on the keyboard. The computer records the accuracy and computes the average of these for each condition. The results were then recorded on paper for each participant’s four conditions. After the participants had completed the experiment
MEMORY SPAN they were asked demographic questions which included gender, age, ethnicity, and class year at school. Participants answered these questions with pencil and paper. After this was completed participants were debriefed and thanked for their involvement.
Results After the data was recorded, the results were then compiled into an SPSS data program to organize each participant’s accuracy of word or digit recognition for the four conditions. A twoway between subjects ANOVA test was conducted to analyze the data collected and determine the relationship between the means of the four conditions. There was a significant main effect of length on recognition such that participants recognized short stimuli with more accuracy than long stimuli, F(1,21) = 11.14, p < 0.01. There was also a significant main effect of type of stimuli on recognition such that words were recognized with more accuracy than digits, F(1,21) = 671.01, p < 0.01. These main effects were qualified by a significant interaction between length and stimulus type, F(1,21) = 68.06, p < 0.01. This interaction showed that the effect of length depended on whether the stimulus was words or digits. This suggests that there is a bigger difference between words and numbers when the stimulus was in long word type. From these significant results a ttest was conducted to find the means of the variables. A t-test showed that when participants were presented with words, accuracy improved as length increased, t(21) = -4.39, p < 0.01. When participants were presented with digits, accuracy decreased as length increased, t(21) = 7.34, p < 0.01. A graph has been constructed to display the results for memory span. Figure 1 shows the effect of stimulus type and length on accuracy. The stimulus was presented to the participants in
MEMORY SPAN two different lengths either short or long which are graphed on the X axis. The other independent variable, type of stimulus is also shown as a line in the graph. The dark purple line marked with a diamond is the word type stimulus and the bright pink line marked with a square is the digit type stimulus. The Y axis shows the range of accuracy the participants had in making their judgements when recognizing the stimuli. According to Figure 1, there was a higher accuracy rate for participants across the word condition compared to the digit condition. This suggests that participants were able to recognize more words than digits over both the short and long conditions. Figure 1 also shows the interaction previously discussed which displays the differences in accuracy across the two variables. Participants recognized long words with more accuracy, while they also recognized short digits with more accuracy. This suggests that as the words became longer the accuracy increased, but as the digits became longer the accuracy decreased. Conclusions According to the significant results of this experiment, there was an effect of the independent variables found on the dependent variable. As expected, the current study found that participants did recognize more 2 digit numbers than 4 digit numbers and did recognize more long words than long numbers. These findings support the previous research in which short numbers are recognized with more accuracy than long numbers, because numbers are abstract in memory and harder to remember after a period of time. In this way, words can be recognized with more accuracy compared to digits, because words are read with automaticity. Previous research by psychologist, Page, suggests that short words take less time to recite than long words, and if a person can recite the words more, they will remember more words.
MEMORY SPAN Therefore, people remember short words more than long words (Page, 1998). The current study found results that would like to suggest something different. The hypothesis was however, only partially supported. Participants were expected to recognize more short words than long words, but instead had more accuracy recognizing more long words than short words. This may have occurred for a few reasons. The participants of this experiment were all college students who are required to do a lot of reading for their classes. Reading becomes an automatic process the more it is performed. As the participants were presented with the stimuli in the word conditions, both short and long, they may have found it easier to recognize the stimuli later, because it was automatic to read those words in the first place. Familiarity to the words may have also allowed the participants to chunk the information more easily. The words in both short and long conditions were created to be familiar to all participants. In this way, information about these words or associations with these words was possibly already existing in the long term memory of the participants. Solso suggests that chunking cannot occur until some information in LTM is activated. As the participants read the words presented to them, they were able to chunk more words based on familiarity. The more words participants can chunk the more capacity they have in short term memory and therefore can recognize more long words. Along with this, participants reported using stories or phrases to help remember the longer words. The participants reported that mnemonics were more easily used for the longer words than the shorter words which helped them have more accuracy. The results of this research, however, still do not specifically answer the questions about the capacity of short term memory and if seven really is the magic number.
MEMORY SPAN
1 0.9 0.8 0.7 Accuracy 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 Short Stimulus Length Long Word Digit
Page, M.P.A & Norris, D. (1998). The primacy model: a new model of immediate serial recall. Psychological Review, 105, 761-781. Solso, R. L. (2005). Cognitive Psychology. Boston, Massachusetts: Pearson Education, Inc.

我要回帖

更多关于 memory的读音 的文章

 

随机推荐