君，已阅读到文档的结尾了呢~~
扫扫二维码，随身浏览文档
手机或平板扫扫即可继续访问
材料快报投稿要求
举报该文档为侵权文档。
举报该文档含有违规或不良信息。
反馈该文档无法正常浏览。
举报该文档为重复文档。
推荐理由：
将文档分享至：
分享完整地址
文档地址：
粘贴到BBS或博客
flash地址：
支持嵌入FLASH地址的网站使用
html代码：
&embed src='/DocinViewer-4.swf' width='100%' height='600' type=application/x-shockwave-flash ALLOWFULLSCREEN='true' ALLOWSCRIPTACCESS='always'&&/embed&
450px*300px480px*400px650px*490px
支持嵌入HTML代码的网站使用
您的内容已经提交成功
您所提交的内容需要审核后才能发布，请您等待！
3秒自动关闭窗口为何国内专家的审稿意见大都如此简单近乎敷衍？
已有 21069 次阅读
|个人分类:|系统分类:|关键词:同行评审，审稿意见，比较，把关
Wang Yingkuan
Beijing, China
IAEJ, CIGR Journal
CIGR Journal
June 27, 2011
Dear Prof. H L L:
Manuscript 1911 EFFECTS OF TRACTOR INFLATION PRESSURE AND TRAFFIC ON SOIL
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
As CIGR section editor, I have conducted a
preliminary review of the above manuscript.&
The manuscript addresses a significant engineering problem in agricultural
crop production, and as such, the subject matter is of interest to CIGR.& However, the manuscript is deficient in
several scientific areas.
The decision is to decline the manuscript
without peer review.& My preliminary
review is attached to the end of this email.&
Please note that the preliminary review is by no means a comprehensive
The manuscript is released, and you are
free to submit it for publication in another journal.& Thank you for considering CIGR for
publication of your work and I wish you success in getting your work published.
P.Eng., Ph.D.,
CIGR Section III editor,
Research Scientist, Agricultural
Engineering,
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada,
Section Editor Review
Title: EFFECTS OF TRACTOR INFLATION
PRESSURE AND TRAFFIC ON SOIL PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
CIGR # 1911
H L L et al.
June 27, 2011
The manuscript addresses soil compaction by
multiple passes with agricultural machinery which is a timely topic and of
importance to sustainable agricultural production.& There are numerous grammatical errors although
the meaning is generally clear.& It is
strongly recommended that the authors seek the assistance of someone well
versed in English to help with the grammar.
The manuscript is not acceptable in its
present form.& It needs a lot of work.& The biggest problem with the manuscript is
that key pieces of information are not given, and that the data analysis is not
complete.& Some of the major deficiencies
are listed below although this is by no means an exhaustive list.
Soil characteristics.& It is well known that soil characteristics
have a huge influence on soil compaction.&
The only description given is that the soil was a sandy loam.& Things like soil series, percent sand, silt
and clay, soil organic matter all influence compaction and need to be provided.
Tractor specifications: Total tractor
weight, tractor axle (or wheel) weights, are critical pieces of information
required for compaction studies, but they are not given.& Tire pressure was given, but no information
was given on whether these pressures were the same for front and rear tires.
Often, tractor manufacturers recommend
different pressures for front and rear tires, particularly on tractors with
different sizes of front and rear tires.
Slip was measured, but there was no mention
made of whether the tractor was free wheeling (no implement draft) or whether
it was pulling a load.& The drawbar load
on a tractor has a huge effect on wheel slip, and must be specified.
It was mentioned that a 4WD tractor was
used, and different tire sizes were given for front and rear tires which
implies that it was a front wheel assist.&
It needs to be specified whether or not the front wheel drive was engaged.
Results: &A randomized complete block statistical design
with three replicates was specified.&
However, the results are given in a series of tables with simple means
with no statistical analysis. &The
results need to be subjected to appropriate statistical analysis, i.e. ANOVA or
multiple regression analysis, and appropriate post hoc tests applied to
determine which means are statistically different from each other.& The experimental design employed lends itself
to standard statistical analysis of the results.& Graphs should be used when appropriate to
help illustrate the data and the trends.
Table 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3 and elsewhere. Cone
index has wrong units.& Cone index is
normally given in MPa or kPa.& Also, the
values for cone index are much lower than normally expected.
Section 2.3&
It is not necessary to list all of the equipment used such as oven, air
compressor, etc.& All you need to say is
that samples were oven dried at 105& C for soil moisture determinations.& Things like air compressor and pressure gauge
are every day shop equipment, are understood to be necessary for any type of
experiment where inflation pressures are changed.
However, things like the penetrometer, and
shear vane meter should be specified.&
These are specialized pieces of equipment and their performance can
affect the results.
Section 2.5.& Need to provide information on which soil
cone penetrometer you used.& Also, how
many penetrometer measurements per plot per pass?& Soil cone penetrometer measurements are
typically very “noisy” with a high degree of variability, and multiple
measurements are required per plot to get a reasonable estimate of mean
penetration resistance.& Also, were penetrometer
measurements made prior to the first pass to get an estimate of initial soil
conditions?& Data prior to first pass
were given in Table 3.1, but the measurements were not mentioned in the text.
Section 2.6.& How did you get the shear vane measurements
at the various depths?& Presumably, you
excavated to the required depth, and made the shear vane measurements at the
bottom of the excavation.& You need to
describe the method here.
Section 2.7.& This section describes in great detail how
samples were dried in the oven.& This
technique is well known.& All you need to
say that samples were oven dried at 105& C for dry weight determinations. Activities
like weighing on a sensitive scale are understood as necessary to get dry bulk
density data. However, the critical piece of information of how you obtained
samples of a known volume for the dry bulk density determinations is completely
missing. Presumably, this was via core samples.&
You need to specify the coring device, in particular, core diameter and
depth.& You do not need to give the formula
for calculating dry bulk density (Eq. 2.1), or soil moisture content.& These formulae are well known by anyone
working with soil physical properties.
Section 3.2.& Not necessary to show all of the detailed
calculations for each inflation pressure.&
Actually, they are all incorrect as they are all missing a closing
parenthesis in the denominator which makes the formula ambiguous.& Just give the formula, and give the results
for the various
inflation pressures in a table.
Section 3.3&
The first sentence does not match the data.& If wheel slip is 3.6% at 48 kPa and 2.7% at
97 kPa, then the wheel slip decreases, not increases when inflation pressure is
increased from 48 kPa to 97 kPa.& Is this
change statistically significant?
Conclusions:
Many of the conclusions are not conclusions
from the present study, as things like tire foot print, tire durability, soil
deformation were not measured in this study.&
Some of the information in the conclusions could be included in the
discussion section with appropriate references to help explain the results, or
the consequence of the results.& The
conclusions should be limited to the conclusions of the study, i.e. what was
done, what was learned, and perhaps the implications or importance of the
results to agriculture, science, or future research.
References.&
There are numerous punctuation errors in the references. References are
tedious, and the formatting requires special attention. Reference by Raghavan
and McKyes 1978 is missing.& This was
cited on page 5.
Also, it is McKyes, not McKyers, there is
no ‘r’ in McKyes.& You need to carefully
check that each reference in the references was cited, and that each citation
in the text is included in the references.&
I did not do a thorough check on this aspect.
________________________________________________________________________
Dr. Wang Yingkuan
Editor-in-Chief of CIGR Journal
The paper focuses on the phone-based system for vegetable production traceability in the field. The topic is interesting. There are some points in the paper that need to be further clarified.
Abstract, the authors mention that “the compatibility test showed that the
success rate was 87.5% on average……”. Why is the average success rate 87.5%?
is the benefit if farmers use the MPRSVT?
details are needed to describe the structure of using the DBMS. Maybe the
authors can use the E-R model to explain the DBMS.
7, what is the “CLDC”?
details are needed to explain the operation records of different activities
merged into one group.
3, there is a lot of information regarding the field being able to be inputted
in MPRSVT. However, the data packet which is explained in page 8 only consists
of the field planting date, field planting field ID, field planting category,
field planting species, etc. How does other inputted information of the MPRSVT send
to the database? For example, are the fertilization information, pest prevent
information, and harvest information also sent by the SMS format? If so, what
is the packet format of that information?
the caption of Figure 4, what is MRKSVT?
Page 9, why was the success rate of the MPRSVT operated on the mobile phones
without expansion cards less than that of the mobile phones with expansion
Some minor issues.
In Page 3, “Sections 4 reports the results……..”
should be modified to “Section 4 reposts the results….”
In Page 7, what is the “UIQ”?
In Figure 4, the text “USB Connection” was overlapped by the line.
In Figure 4, the line with the “Information
Collection” is missing an arrow.
In Figure 7, the text “field identifying
number” was covered by the line.
In Figure 8, some texts are placed out of the
Please use consistent fonts in figures throughout
the article.
Confidential Comments to
Associate Editor/Division Editor/Editor-in-chief
I recommend
the authors should use consistent fonts throughout the article. The
paper cannot be accepted in its present form.
中国大陆专家1评审论文意见&
Section III: Comments
This section is the most valuable part of the review for the
author(s), who are extremely interested in how you formed your opinion of this
paper. Please provide specific comments that will help the author(s) understand
your review, and possibly prepare a revision. Use all the space you need.
This paper assess the O2
consumption rate and the CO2 evolution rate in tomato pomace treated
with Pleurotus ostreatus without and
with Mn to determine if peak colonization rate (for heightened delignification)
was delayed by amendment. Generally speaking, the author’s work is useful and
suggestive. The author gives a brief introduction to the related work and
compares his ideas to others. The theoretical analysis of this article is
strong. In
all, this manuscript has good novelty and strong technical strength, I’m
looking forward the results of further investigations on this topic.
In Table 1, notes are
not enough in this manuscript. In the Results and Discussion, results have been
detailed explained, but some theoretical analysis of the experimental data are not sufficient.
Confidential Comments to Associate Editor/Division
I hope the paper will be
published to guide more researchers.
Reviewers’ information (Blind to Authors)
中国大陆专家2评审论文意见(相对而言属于国内专家评审较为认真仔细的了)&
Section III: Comments
This section is the most valuable part of the review for the
author(s), who are extremely interested in how you formed your opinion of this
paper. Please provide specific comments that will help the author(s) understand
your review, and possibly prepare a revision. Use all the space you need.
Variable Spray will play an
important role in saving resources, protecting environment, raising quality of
agricultural product. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate PWM-based
continuous variable spray in terms of spray distribution pattern, spray droplet
size, and spray angle for flat-fan, hollow-cone and solid-cone nozzles. The
test design, results, analysis and conclusion are correct. After re-review,
this paper may be published, I think.
read a paper named “Variable rate Continuous Spray Equipment Based on PWM
Technology and Its Spray Characteristics”, which was published in Transactions
of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, ): 77-80 (in
Chinese)”(see the attachment), I think that is a previous study work of the
authors. If that is correct, I suggest the author adding that paper in the
references of this paper. And then, the contents which have been described in
the previous paper can be deleted from this paper.
abstract “The sensitivities of the spray angles to flow-rate are 0.8254o/%0.6681o/%0.5761o/%
respectively for flat-fan, the hollow-cone and the solid-cone nozzles”. In
English, without the symbol “”.
The numerical
data in the conclusion are not the same as those in the abstract”.
Confidential Comments to Associate Editor/Division
Reviewers’ information (Blind to Authors)&
中国大陆专家3评审论文意见&
Section III: Comments
This section is the most valuable part of the review for the
author(s), who are extremely interested in how you formed your opinion of this
paper. Please provide specific comments that will help the author(s) understand
your review, and possibly prepare a revision. Use all the space you need.
This paper is more important, but it still needs major
revision requiring re-review.
Revision suggestions
of this paper:
1. The study results
and conclusions should be clarified in abstract.
2. It should be
described clearly about the data and size of NACA0015 airfoil which was
selected in the numerical simulation in section 2.1.
3. It should be
described clearly about the specific quantitative conditions of icing in
section 3.
4. This paper is
required re-review after revision.
Confidential Comments to Associate Editor/Division
相关专题：
转载本文请联系原作者获取授权，同时请注明本文来自科学网博客，链接地址：
上一篇：下一篇：
当前推荐数：32
评论 ( 个评论)
作者的精选博文
作者的其他最新博文
热门博文导读
Powered by
Copyright &投稿要求里，有这么一段话大概是什么意思_百度知道
投稿要求里，有这么一段话大概是什么意思
提问者采纳
Provide the TOC graphic titled for “table of contents only” upon submission of the paper as the last page of the manuscript，一般配一副图片. high and 3;TEM photograph.375 in, or reaction scheme, or numbers within the graphic must be legible, in conjunction with the manuscript title, drawing。包含题目 作者 页码 衣服图片 以及文章的简介. Type size of labels. The TOC graphic should be in the form of a structure。这个东西一般出现在当期论文集的前面（目录），能引人眼球. This graphic should capture the reader’s attention and.6 cm × 8，对你的文章做一个简单的介绍. Tables or spectra are not acceptable. The author must submit a graphic in the actual size to be used for the TOC that will fit in an area 1.5 in, SEM&#47.就是让你写一个东西, should give the reader a quick visual impression of the essence of the paper without providing specific results, formulas. Larger images will be reduced to fit within those dimensions. wide (3, graph.9 cm). Color is acceptable and will be free of charge upon approval of the EditorTable of Contents Graphic A graphic must be included with each manuscript for the Table of Contents (TOC)
来自团队：
其他类似问题
为您推荐：
投稿的相关知识
等待您来回答
下载知道APP
随时随地咨询
出门在外也不愁审稿意见参考_百度文库
两大类热门资源免费畅读
续费一年阅读会员，立省24元！
审稿意见参考
上传于||暂无简介
阅读已结束，如果下载本文需要使用0下载券
想免费下载更多文档？
下载文档到电脑，查找使用更方便
还剩6页未读，继续阅读
你可能喜欢