not at all 和you are welcome有什么区别_百度知道
not at all 和you are welcome有什么区别
我有更好的答案
not at all:根本不，一点儿也不you are welcome:不用谢
you are welcome:不用谢
采纳率：59%
来自团队：
为您推荐：
其他类似问题
换一换
回答问题，赢新手礼包
个人、企业类
违法有害信息,请在下方选择后提交
色情、暴力
我们会通过消息、邮箱等方式尽快将举报结果通知您。扫二维码下载作业帮
3亿+用户的选择
下载作业帮安装包
扫二维码下载作业帮
3亿+用户的选择
You are not at all wrong.这句话是主系表结构吧?表语是not at all wrong对吗?这四个单词分别是什么词性?at all的位置是随便放吗?
作业帮用户
扫二维码下载作业帮
3亿+用户的选择
楼主你好此句是主系表结构you作为主语 are作为系动词 wrong作为表语；在这里not at all 只是起到强调作用“你一点没错”,不然单单you are not wrong也是可以的“你没错”；not at all 是一个固定的副词短语,“一点也不”常用的形式句型You are not wrong at all,这样最合适.希望帮到你.满意请采纳,谢谢
。。。为什么构成一个词组？这得去问外国人，问什么一定要把这三个拼在一块。。。 我只能跟你说语法就是这个样子，什么时候根据什么需要用什么单词你问三个分别是什么词性：not 否定词你肯定知道的吧，at 介词，all 副词，同样是外国决定的，我们学的时候就是这么学的不要再问all为什么是副词这类幼稚的问题，问之前先自问为什么中国人说中国话，中国话为什么叫中国话。
为您推荐：
其他类似问题
扫描下载二维码News is bad for you – and giving up reading it will make you happier | Media | The Guardian
In the past few decades, the fortunate among us have recognised the hazards of living with an overabundance of food (obesity, diabetes) and have started to change our diets. But most of us do not yet understand that news is to the mind what sugar is to the body. News is easy to digest. The media feeds us small bites of&trivial matter, tidbits that don't really concern our lives and don't require thinking. That's why we experience almost no saturation. Unlike reading books and long magazine articles (which require thinking), we can swallow limitless quantities of news flashes, which are bright-coloured candies for the mind. Today, we have reached the same point in relation to information that we faced 20 years ago in regard to food. We are beginning to recognise how&toxic news can be.
News misleads. Take the following event (borrowed from Nassim Taleb). A&car drives over a bridge, and the bridge collapses. What does the news media focus on? The car. The person in the car. Where he came from. Where he planned to go. How he experienced the crash (if he survived). But that is all irrelevant. What's relevant? The structural stability of the bridge. That's the underlying risk that has been lurking, and could lurk in other bridges. But the car is flashy, it's dramatic, it's a&person (non-abstract), and it's news that's cheap to produce. News leads us to walk around with the completely wrong risk map in our heads. So terrorism is over-rated. Chronic stress is under-rated. The collapse of Lehman Brothers is overrated. Fiscal irresponsibility is under-rated. Astronauts are over-rated. Nurses are under-rated.
We are not rational enough to be exposed to the press. Watching an airplane crash on television is going to&change your attitude toward that risk,&regardless of its real probability. If&you think you can compensate with&the strength of your own inner contemplation, you are wrong. Bankers and economists – who have powerful incentives to compensate for news-borne hazards – have shown that they cannot. The only solution: cut yourself off from news consumption entirely.
News is irrelevant. Out of the approximately 10,000 news stories you have read in the last 12 months, name one that – because you consumed it – allowed you to make a better decision about a serious matter affecting your life, your career or your business. The point is: the consumption of news is irrelevant to you. But people find it very difficult to recognise what's relevant. It's&much easier to recognise what's new. The relevant versus the new is the fundamental battle of the current age. Media organisations want you to believe that news offers you some sort of a competitive advantage. Many fall for that. We get anxious when we're cut off from the flow of news. In reality, news consumption is a competitive disadvantage. The less news you consume, the bigger the advantage you have.
News has no explanatory power. News items are bubbles popping on the&surface of a deeper world. Will accumulating facts help you understand the world? Sadly, no. The relationship is inverted. The important stories are non-stories: slow, powerful movements that develop below journalists' radar but have a transforming effect. The more "news factoids" you digest, the less of the big picture you will understand. If&more information leads to higher economic success, we'd expect journalists to be at the top of the pyramid. That's not the case.
News is toxic to your body. It constantly triggers the . Panicky stories spur the release of cascades of glucocorticoid (cortisol). This deregulates your immune system and inhibits the release of growth hormones. In other words, your body finds itself in a state of chronic stress. High glucocorticoid levels cause impaired digestion, lack of growth (cell,&hair, bone), nervousness and susceptibility to infections. The other&potential side-effects include fear,&aggression, tunnel-vision and&desensitisation.
News increases cognitive errors. News feeds the mother of all cognitive errors: confirmation bias. In the words of Warren Buffett: "What the human being is best at doing is interpreting all new information so that their prior conclusions remain intact." News exacerbates this flaw. We become prone to overconfidence, take stupid risks and misjudge opportunities. It also exacerbates another cognitive error: the story bias. Our brains crave stories that "make sense" – even if they don't correspond to reality. Any journalist who writes, "The market moved because of X" or "the company went bankrupt because of Y" is an idiot. I am fed up with this cheap way of "explaining" the world.
News inhibits thinking. Thinking requires concentration. Concentration requires uninterrupted time. News pieces are specifically engineered to interrupt you. They are like viruses that steal attention for their own purposes. News makes us shallow thinkers. But it's worse than that. News severely affects memory. There are two types of memory. Long-range memory's capacity is nearly infinite, but working memory is limited to a certain amount of slippery data. The path from short-term to long-term memory is a choke-point in the brain, but anything you want to understand must pass through it. If this passageway is disrupted, nothing gets through. Because news disrupts concentration, it weakens comprehension. Online news has an even worse impact.
showed that comprehension declines as the number of hyperlinks in a document increases. Why? Because whenever a link appears, your brain has to at least make the choice not to click, which in itself is distracting. News is an intentional interruption system.
News works like a drug. As stories develop, we want to know how they continue. With hundreds of arbitrary storylines in our heads, this craving is increasingly compelling and hard to ignore. Scientists used to think that the dense connections formed among the 100 billion neurons inside our skulls were largely fixed by the time we reached adulthood. Today we know that this is not the case. Nerve cells routinely break old connections and form new ones. The more news we consume, the more we exercise the neural circuits devoted to skimming and multitasking while ignoring those used for reading deeply and thinking with profound focus. Most news consumers – even if they used to be avid book readers – have lost the ability to absorb lengthy articles or books. After four, five pages they get tired, their concentration vanishes, they become restless. It's not because they got older or their schedules became more onerous. It's because the physical structure of their brains has changed.
News wastes time. If you read the newspaper for 15 minutes each morning, then check the news for 15 minutes during lunch and 15 minutes before you go to bed, then add five minutes here and there when you're at work, then count distraction and refocusing time, you will lose at least half a day every week. Information is no longer a scarce commodity. But attention is. You are not&that irresponsible with your money, reputation or health. Why give away your mind?
News makes us passive. News stories are overwhelmingly about things you cannot influence. The daily repetition of news about things we can't act upon makes us passive. It grinds us down until we adopt a worldview that is pessimistic, desensitised, sarcastic and fatalistic. The scientific term is "learned helplessness". It's a bit of a stretch, but I&would not be surprised if news consumption, at least partially contributes to the widespread disease of depression.
News kills creativity. Finally, things we already know limit our creativity. This is one reason that mathematicians, novelists, composers and entrepreneurs often produce their most creative works at a young age. Their brains enjoy a wide, uninhabited space that emboldens them to come up with and pursue novel ideas. I don't know a single truly creative mind who is a news junkie – not a writer, not a composer, mathematician, physician, scientist, musician, designer, architect or painter. On the other hand, I&know a bunch of viciously uncreative minds who consume news like drugs. If you want to come up with old solutions, read news. If you are looking for new solutions, don't.
Society needs journalism – but in a&different way. Investigative journalism is always relevant. We need reporting that polices our institutions and uncovers truth. But important findings don't have to arrive in the form of news. Long journal articles and in-depth books are good, too.
I have now gone without news for four years, so I can see, feel and report the effects of this freedom first-hand: less disruption, less anxiety, deeper thinking, more time, more insights. It's not easy, but it's worth it.
This is an edited extract from an essay first published at . The Art of Thinking Clearly: Better Thinking, Better Decisions by Rolf Dobelli is published by Sceptre, ?9.99. Buy it for ?7.99 at
Loading comments…
More more on this story当前位置： &nbsp > &nbsp&nbsp >&nbsp正文
1. Anytime 别客气，随时愿为您效劳。
Anytime 这个词的本意是&任何时候，无论何时&。当别人说&谢谢&的时候，你说 anytime就表示&别客气，(无论何时都)愿为您效劳&的意思。口语里，还可以说anytime my friend，对陌生人甚至也可以这样讲，很礼貌。
2. Don't mention it. 别和我见外。
我们都知道mention表示&提及&的意思。&不用提了&就说明客套话都省了吧!听起来是不是很仗义，够哥们?
3. My pleasure. 别客气，我很荣幸。
这句话比&You&re welcome&更加正式，语气也强。通常男生们会在女生面前显示一下自己足够绅士，用上这句话。你还可以说，&It was my pleasure.&或者&Pleasure is all mine.&
4. No worries. 没问题。
在澳大利亚可能会更常用一些，意思就是不用担心啦(do not worry about that), 也可以说 &that&s alright&, 或者 &sure thing&。这句话，给人感觉很友好风趣，有一种澳洲的兄弟情义。在美语里，也可以说 &no problem&或者 &not a problem&。
5. No sweat. 小意思！
&Sweat&在英文里是&汗水&的意思，no sweat，你可以理解为一滴汗也没出就把事情办好了。是不是听上去很够意思呢?
6. Not at all. 不用谢！
Not at all 就是&一点儿也不&的意思，它既可以表达&没关系&，也可以是&不客气&。比如，他人道谢后，你就可以说，&Not at all. I enjoyed it.&(别客气，很高兴能帮到你。)
市场合作联系
联系人靳华
E-mailjinhua#wps.cn
jinhua#kingsoft.com
广告合作联系
联系人蔡先生扫二维码下载作业帮
3亿+用户的选择
下载作业帮安装包
扫二维码下载作业帮
3亿+用户的选择
not at all和you are welcome相等吗?
作业帮用户
扫二维码下载作业帮
3亿+用户的选择
not at all：一、用于回答感谢,意为“不用谢；不客气”.二、用于回答带有感谢性质的客套话.意为“没什么；哪里哪里”.三、用于回答道歉,意为“没关系”.四、用来表示否定(是No的加强说法),意为“一点也不：完全不”.you are welcome仅仅用于当对方表示感谢之后
为您推荐：
其他类似问题
扫描下载二维码